Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Through The Looking Glass


Contact has been made, I'm now a fully signed up member of the Autodynamics Yahoo group. Fear not I haven't been assimilated, or turned to the dark side but it does provide an opportunity to ask some interesting questions. You can see my posts starting here, as you can see I haven't been very original with my screen name. As they already knew who I was, from this very blog, there didn't seem much point in trying to hide my identity. Should I turn up murdered, by a hail of electro-muons (WTF are they supposed to be anyway?), you'll know two things, that they were right after all and that what you don't believe in can still hurt you.

I have only had a few posts so far but have managed to discern certain features already. So far most of the people posting seem very keen to help, in sort of the creepy way you get with religious fanatics, you know what I mean, they offer you loads of free tea and biscuits, you sit there quietly nibbling on a rich tea but all the while you know they're eyeing up your soul, figuring out what it must be worth in the afterlife. Some of the responses are simply mistaken, some confused and some to put it mildly simply bat-shit mad, as in naked man running down the street claiming he can't get the spiders off mad, for example this one.

I have already learned several interesting "facts" about AD, like the fact that in AD E=mc^2 is believed to be true but c can change. So it applies differently to different objects, for electrons/protons c is the speed of light, but if they need to postulate (that's a fancy word for make up) a new particle that can travel faster than light, say the pico-graviton then c can actually be anything, like 27, 100 or the average IQ of and ADherent (50) divided by the number of times electro-muons detected in actual experiments (0) = infinity times the speed of light (Apologies just couldn't resist). Yes I know that's mental, but there you have it. To date I have had ignored the points where AD just doesn't work with what we know about the Universe, things like the existence of neutrinos, in favour of looking for inconsistencies in the theory itself, but I have learned that it isn't so much a theory as a bunch of ad hoc bolt ons, so if you disprove one they just stick another one on, like the non constancy of c as a speed limit. In future I think I may well bring in the selective way they apply their theory, any experiments they can match are good, any they cannot must be wrong etc.

So far its been fun, its forcing me to understand real Physics better, which is good (and useful in my line of work), but I think its also quite interesting to see the dynamics (no pun intended) of the group and how they respond to queries, so far mostly through constant exhortations to buy the book. Which of course I have no intention of doing.

3 comments:

IbaDaiRon said...

"Haye haye we're the Monkeys!"

Isn't "Granny Light" everything I intimated she would be? :)

So...how are them there remedial reading lessons going?

(snort)

Did you take a look at what she asked David to post on the website yet?

Observer 1’s system had a rest mass equal to 100 MeV moving to the right with a velocity equal to 0.9 c. ... Because the v3 value is get through a Dynamics equation, the real equation, the real phenomenon in the World that we are living in, where the phenomenon expend energy, and v3S is the result after applying a Kinematics equation, which doesn’t represent the real phenomenon in Nature.

She's right, of course, you know. I've often been struck by the strangeness of the behavior of objects I've observed moving at 0.9 c!

(Where c is a REAL constant, equal to the speed of light in a vacuum.)

(snort)

chenxin said...

20150713 chenxin
gucci uk
ray ban sunglasses
true religion jeans
louis vuitton pas cher
louis vuitton
ray ban glasses
oakley sunglasses wholesale
burberry sale
oakley sunglasses outlet
gucci borse
true religion outlet
hollister clothing
cheap ray ban sunglasses
air max 90
prada outlet
soccer shoes
pandora jewelry
coach outlet online
michael kors outlet
nike air force
pandora outlet
tory burch handbags
louboutin
coach factory outlet
longchamp handbags
ray ban sunglass
air max 95
coach outlet online
coach outlet online
fitflops outlet
rolex watches
chanel bags
burberry outlet online
polo ralph lauren outlet
toms shoes outlet
michael kors outlet
chaussure louboutin
chanel handbags
cheap oakleys
burberry scarf

fattoma said...

http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/packaging-furniture-companies-6.html
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/packaging-furniture-companies-3.html
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/packaging-furniture-companies-7.html
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/packaging-furniture-companies-5.html
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/packaging-furniture-companies-4.html
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/packaging-furniture-companies-2.html
http://www.prokr.net/2016/09/packaging-furniture-companies.html